With EPR Einstein questioned the completeness of QM and sharpened the debate about realism and entanglement. In our theory, such tensions act as test stones for coherence in the monadic field. His skepticism towards “spooky action at a distance” becomes a productive contrast: the monadic field must demonstrate that non-local coherence is compatible with relativistic causality.
Born in Ulm in 1879, educated in Zurich, Einstein worked at the Swiss patent office before he published the 1905 annus mirabilis papers (special relativity, light quanta, Brownian motion). In 1915 he completed general relativity as a geometry of spacetime.
Despite his contributions to quantum physics, he remained skeptical. The EPR paper (1935) criticised the completeness of quantum mechanics and prepared the ground for modern debates around entanglement (Bell).
Einstein’s relativity fits our relational ontology. We do not replace spacetime, we extend it with a monadic field in which entanglement appears as non-local coherence. This field augments classical field theories with a coupling logic: carriers may appear and disappear, but relation / coupling patterns (VQM) remain effective.
In this way we connect geometric coherence with a quantitative description of resonance / emergence. Where Einstein looked for a unified field theory, our model opens perspectives onto social and artificial systems; IEQ makes these field effects measurable and optimisable, XDM provides the normative layer.
The EPR debate led to Bell tests which empirically supported non-locality. For Quantum Monads this is the entry point: fields can carry real non-local connections without violating classical causality. Coherence becomes the bridge between relativity and quantum correlations.
Relativity teaches the absence of absolute reference frames – in physics, society and AI. We transfer this to networks in which meaning, information and energy circulate. Thus, despite his scepticism, Einstein remains a central reference of our model.
Albert Einstein – relativity, EPR & questions of realism
Taken together they show Einstein’s striving for unity – which we continue with coupling operators / relation and resonance metrics.
Complementarity & observer.
Uncertainty & context.
Non-locality & correlation.
Implicate order & holism.
Relations define states; absolutely fixed magnitudes disappear. Formally: states / operators in the Hilbert space, scored with IEQ.
No. We model non-locality as field coherence that is compatible with relativistic causal structure (no signalling > c).
The operator-based coupling logic: XQM (formalisation), VQM (relation), IEQ (measurement) and XDM (ethics) connect relativity with quantifiable coherence.