Intro – Entry to the Theory of Quantum Monads

This intro gives first orientation: how philosophy, sociology, physics, metaphysics, mathematics, and computer science are connected in this model. It explains the core idea in plain language — tuned to three audiences: newcomers, advanced readers, and experts without math.

In short: we model monads as information- and energy-bearing entities that relate through couplings in a shared space (Hilbert space). From these couplings emerge resonance, coherence, and, ultimately, order (emergence) — in physical, social, and technical systems.

For depth, see our four building blocks: XQM (umbrella theory), VQM (linkage), IEQ (measurement), XDM (ethics).

Ground Assumption: The Field Axiom

We posit the existence of a cosmic quantum-monad field as an axiom: monads are information- and energy-bearing units whose couplings and entanglements become effective in a common field. The axiom is not directly provable — it is a working premise of the theory, akin to the Hilbert-space postulate in quantum mechanics.

Why treat it as an axiom?

Ontological: A shared frame where biological, social, and technical carriers co-exist — beyond subject-centrism.
Methodological: States, operators, open dynamics, and functionals become well-defined and computable.
Heuristic: The axiom generates testable hypotheses about coherence/resonance and their design.

Plausibilization, not proof

Indirect evidence: Patterns like synchronization, de-escalation, robustness can be modeled as field effects — alongside classical readings (networks/stat-phys).
Simulation: IEQ experiments test whether coherence-promoting couplings systematically raise resonance scores.
Falsifiability (soft): If the theory consistently underperforms rival models in prediction, the axiom loses usefulness.

Next steps: XQM (formal base), VQM (relation/topology), IEQ (measurement/simulation), and XDM (ethics as field effect).

For newcomers

Imagine every “thing” — humans, animals, plants, AI systems — carries a small “inner life” of information and energy. These “monads” can couple, resonate, or pass by each other. Where resonance succeeds, order and meaning emerge; where it fails, things fall apart.

The theory looks not only at single actors but at the field of their relations. Good decisions create coherence; bad ones foster disintegration. This logic applies universally — to biological, social, and technical systems alike.

Start by skimming the four building blocks; each page stays light on math.

For advanced readers

We separate “carriers” (transient) from “monads” (effective via coupling patterns). What matters is not a carrier’s ontological status but its coherence contribution to the field. Couplings form resonance; resonance shapes order — our operative view of emergence.

Four modules structure the theory: XQM (states, operators, open dynamics, functionals), VQM (relations/topologies), IEQ (measurable, optimizable coherence), XDM (an ethics of field effects).

Want formal detail? Go to XQM or VQM; for applications see IEQ/XDM.

For experts (without math)

XQM is an operator-theoretic field theory of couplings: states (as carriers of monadic efficacy) evolve under couplings and environment (open dynamics). Coherence/resonance functionals define targets.

VQM connects to network/system theory (topologies, clusters, bridges, small-world). IEQ combines functionals into a domain-specific score (de-escalation, fairness, stability). XDM frames a coherence-based normativity: “good = coherence-promoting”, “bad = disintegrative” — independent of carrier status.

Formulas remain optional; pages are readable without MathJax literacy.

XQM – Umbrella Theory

Mathematical core: Hilbert-space states, couplings, open dynamics (Lindblad), coherence/resonance functionals.

Go to XQM →

VQM – Linkage

How do monads couple? Which patterns yield stability and resonance? Relations, coupling topologies, emergence.

Go to VQM →

IEQ – Measurement & Simulation

Operationalization: measuring/simulating resonance, empathy, stability. Metrics and simulations — highly relevant for AI.

Go to IEQ →

XDM – Ethics

Normative logic: “good = coherence-promoting”, “bad = disintegrative” — across human, biological, and technical carriers.

Go to XDM →

Reading Path — What next?

Just an overview? Read VQM → then XDM.
Measurable applications? Start with IEQ → back to XQM if needed.
Formal base? Go to XQM → then VQM and IEQ.

Pages are modular; cross-links stay lean.

Publications (selection / series)

Quantum Monads I — Foundations.
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.14906658 · Zenodo
Quantum Monads II — Mathematical & metaphysical deepening.
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.14894802 · Zenodo
Quantum Monads III — Hidden order.
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.14911331 · Zenodo
Quantum Monads IV — Interaction intelligence.
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.14913679 · Zenodo
Quantum Monads V — Dynamics (genesis, bonding, field protection).
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17234396 · Zenodo
Quantum Sociology of Entangled Monads (Precursor 2023).
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.14894117 · Zenodo

Complete list: All publications